EU’s oil ban: if market friction is low, so is the pain for Russia - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
FT商学院

EU’s oil ban: if market friction is low, so is the pain for Russia

The bloc’s agreed partial embargo may prove to be ineffective as higher prices could compensate for reduced volumes

The aim of economic warfare is to inflict maximum pain at minimum cost. Achieving that is hard when the target is a key commodity producer. The EU’s agreement to ban most Russian oil imports reflects justified outrage at the barbaric invasion of Ukraine. But it may prove to be ineffective.

The problem with oil is that it is traded internationally. Higher prices may compensate Russia for reduced volumes, as US Treasury secretary Janet Yellen argued in April. Equally, customers in the EU and outside it may swap sources of supply in response to price signals, with little ultimate impact on the Russian exchequer.

The lower the level of substitution, the more powerful the partial embargo. Some countries, for example, lack refineries that can process Urals, Russia’s sulphurous main export blend.

That is not a problem for China and India. They have already moved to fill the gap in demand for Russian oil created by self-sanctioning by European refiners and traders. India rarely bought Russian oil in the past. But it emerged as the largest purchaser of Russian Urals crude in April, according to S&P Global.

Asian countries may not take up the full slack in demand for Russian oil, however, fearing retaliatory western sanctions. Capital Economics thinks Russia’s oil exports will fall by a fifth this year, even allowing for a 15 per cent rise in exports to non-western countries. But after factoring in higher prices, the consultancy estimates that Russia’s oil export revenues will be $180bn, a mere $2bn lower than in 2021.

The gap between Brent and Urals crude — currently $31 — may eventually fall in response to substitution. One response from the west may be to ban its insurers from covering tankers carrying Russian oil. Creating friction of a logistical kind is one way of compensating for a lack of it in markets.

Even after the oil embargo is fully phased in next year, it may be more than offset by higher gas prices. The oil embargo reduces Europe’s financial complicity. It will not, by itself, sabotage the Russian war machine.

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

全球最大锂生产商:西方无法结束对中国关键矿产的依赖

雅保的首席执行官肯特•马斯特斯表示,将电动汽车供应链中的大宗商品从亚洲转向其他地区,在经济上不可行。

丹格特寻求数十亿美元以增加尼日利亚新炼油厂的原油供应

非洲首富正在与国际银行洽谈资金事宜,他的目标是结束非洲对进口的依赖。

美国关于重启三里岛核电站的争论

法律威胁、技能短缺和监管挑战使核事故现场工厂的重新开放变得更加复杂。

纳米比亚寻求通过石油和天然气发现实现GDP增长翻番

能源部长阿尔文多期待经济繁荣,因为民众在选举前日益躁动不安。

科技投资者泽维尔•尼尔敦促欧洲AI初创企业不要套现离场

法国亿万富翁、字节跳动董事会成员警告称,如果该地区错过人工智能热潮,它将是“一个被遗弃了几代人的非常小的大陆”。

美国银行交易资产自金融危机以来首次突破一万亿美元

增加的大部分是股票,但对结构性信贷的投资也在增加。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×