Golden shares: a tarnished solution that smacks of protectionism - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
FT商学院

Golden shares: a tarnished solution that smacks of protectionism

State shares take a toll in terms of performance and free markets

State-held shares are back on the agenda. Popular during Europe’s wave of privatisation in the 1970s and 80s, so called golden shares — spezialaktie in Germany — allowed governments to wield control over a slew of public companies including utilities and oil and gas majors. By far the bulk had been redeemed by the turn of the millennium.

With globalisation in retreat and protectionism firmly re-ensconced, British politicians are hoping to spark a revival. The defence committee wants them reinstated across defence companies, irked at US private equity owned Cobham’s $3.6bn bid for Ultra Electronics. More speciously, MP Tom Tugendhat is angling for a government share — and a 25.1 per cent stake — in Arm, the chip designer, which owner SoftBank plans to list in New York after its planned $40bn sale to Nvidia collapsed. Echoing Washington and Beijing, he argues that national security is part and parcel of technological leadership.

State shares, like those held by tech founders, take a toll in terms of performance and free markets. An asymmetric veto on takeovers deprives other shareholders of the opportunity to sell; a particular handicap in the UK’s M&A-heavy market. Take the redemption of golden shares in water and electricity utilities in the mid-1990s. To the dismay of politicians, this unleashed a flurry of bids and within two years all but one of the 12 regional electricity companies had been flogged.

The European Commission, more concerned at the impediment to the free flow of capital, was largely successful in stamping them out although holdouts — especially in the UK — remain. These include BAE and Rolls-Royce, both of which operate defence capabilities.

There is a case to be made for government vetoes when it comes to national security. Golden shares also have a use elsewhere, such as fostering environmental or social missions. The Thomson family’s founders’ share in Thomson Reuters, designed to safeguard independence and lack of bias in reporting, also makes sense. Slapping similar government rights on to tech companies does not.

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

奢侈品牌期待美国消费者推动复苏

在中国市场增长乏力之际,美国经济的强势和特朗普大选后的反弹将使该行业在其最大的市场中受益。

马来西亚加强同新加坡的经济联系

两国设立柔佛-新加坡经济特区,这为曾经的东南亚竞争对手之间建立更紧密的关系铺平了道路。

法律人工智能正在深入工作场所

加普:人工智能技术使企业可以自动起草许多合同,而无需依赖律师。

特朗普新迷因币的价值是什么?

总统及其家人提供的加密项目具有价值,但不一定是财务方面的价值。
1天前

有意首次公开募股的eToro勇敢抓住市场牛市的牛角

尽管这家总部位于以色列的公司在实现持续增长方面很难,但它仍希望利用股票和加密货币的繁荣。
2天前

为什么欧洲难以购买更多的美国天然气?

唐纳德•特朗普威胁欧盟要征收关税,除非欧盟增加从美国进口液化天然气。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×