Don’t dismiss market bubbles — some leave lasting progress behind | 金融泡沫有好的一面吗? - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
FT英语电台

Don’t dismiss market bubbles — some leave lasting progress behind
金融泡沫有好的一面吗?

For every few dozen flops, there can be companies that provide long-term innovation
泡沫会带来大量无效的资源错配和企业倒闭,但也会带来一些影响深远的创新。
00:00

The writer, Morgan Stanley Investment Management’s chief global strategist, is author of ‘The Ten Rules of Successful Nations’ 

Amid much loose talk of “bubbles” popping all over the financial markets, it’s worth pausing to consider if these upheavals really qualify as bubbles. If so, what does history tell us about how far they might deflate from here? It turns out the answers are quite a few, and quite far. 

As bubbles peak, they combine objective signs of excess — prices rising much faster than earnings can justify — with subjective signs of mania, such as frenzied trading and borrowing. To some the entire US stock market looks bubbly given its dizzying run-up, but earnings growth has also been extraordinarily strong through the pandemic. Beneath the surface, however, sectors of the market from green tech to cryptocurrency show tell-tale bubble signs.

My research on the 10 biggest bubbles of the past century, from the US stock market in 1929 to Chinese shares in 2015, shows that prices typically rise 100 per cent in the year before the peak, with much of the gain packed into the climactic last months. That finding is closely in line with bubble studies from academics at Harvard and others. 

By those standards, there are at least five current bubblets. They include the cryptocurrency market for bitcoin and ethereum; clean energy stocks, including some of the biggest names in electric vehicles; small cap stocks, including many of the hottest pandemic stories; a basket of tech stocks that lack earnings, which is also chock-a-block with famous brands; and special purpose acquisition companies (Spacs), which allow investors a new way to buy into private firms before they go public.

Each of these bubblets is captured in an index that rose in the last year by around 100 per cent, often much more, to a peak value between $500bn and $2.5tn. Day traders and other newbies rushed in, a common symptom of late stage market manias. Now these bubbles are faltering, as they so often do, in response to increases in long-term interest rates. What’s next?

The historical bubbles in my study did suffer midcourse setbacks on the way up, but typically those corrections were around 25 per cent and never more than 35 per cent. Beyond that point — a 35 per cent drop — the bubbles in my sample became monophasic, or stuck on a one-way downhill path.

For the median case, the bottom was found 70 per cent below the peak, and came just over two years after the peak. Except for the index of small-cap pandemic stocks, the other four bubble candidates have all experienced drops of at least 35 per cent, but also of no more than 50 per cent (in the case of ethereum). In other words, they are not likely to resume inflating any time soon, and they are still far from the typical bottom. 

There is one new factor that could upset this historical pattern. Despite the rise in long-term interest rates, there is plenty of liquidity sloshing around the markets, with central banks committed to easy money as never before. The risks though are skewed to the downside. 

It is important to remember that a bubble is often a good idea gone too far. In the early 2000s, the conventional wisdom was that the dotcom bubble had fuelled mainly junk companies with business plans barely worth the napkins they were written on. Later, researchers found that, compared with other bubbles, those in the tech sector produce many start-ups that fail but also help launch major innovations. For every few dozen dotcom flame-outs, there was a giant survivor such as Google or Amazon that would go on to make the economy more productive.

By and large, the bubblets of 2021 fit this profile. The tech trends that accelerated during the pandemic, from teleconferencing to online learning, will help increase productivity for long after the pandemic passes. The demand for greener cars and energy is very unlikely to abate until climate change does. Though often ridiculed as “blank cheque companies”, Spacs can also be looked at as an innovative new way to finance initial public offerings.

The most intriguing new idea is cryptocurrency. Impassioned debate over its future helps explain the gyrations of bitcoin, now on the far side of its third massive run-up in eight years. It is an outlier to which historical patterns may not well apply. And there remains a sound case for a secure digital store of value which cuts out the middlemen and offers an alternative to the overstretched US dollar.

Skimming off the froth will be painful for many. But history will judge the bubblets of 2021 by what they leave behind, not just by how far they fall from here. 

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

梁文锋如何让装腔作势的硅谷大佬们现出原形?

梁文锋并不是普通的技术极客:他不与硅谷大佬们为伍。

深度求索的成功对美中科技战意味着什么?

从集中封闭的模型转向开源模式,使每个人都能平等地获取人工智能。

北美贸易战会产生什么影响?

汽车制造商、食品生产商和建筑业受到的冲击最大,但美国、墨西哥和加拿大的消费者也可能受到影响。

深度求索对你的投资组合意味着什么?

投资者对英伟达及其他“瑰丽七股”过度投资——从本周的股市暴跌中他们能学到什么教训?

基金经理表示,深度求索不会破坏华尔街的科技股涨势

中国初创公司可能会重新洗牌人工智能热潮中的赢家和输家。

中国在日本的电视市场抢尽风头

事实证明,低估中国竞争对手的聪明才智是不明智的。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×